What are we trying to accomplish? Are we efforting to understand time, space and knowledge? Or are we reveling in and cultivating a direct opening – an opening available through time, space and knowing?
I’ve often thought about how it seems like we are always starting in the same place when we discuss any aspect of the vision. This is not a judgment, but an interesting observation. Is there a sense that we are ‘farther along’ as a group and individually than we were a year ago? Again, just a provocative question. As a study group, or just on our own, are we working toward some depth or completeness of understanding? And what are the indicators of understanding?
Sometimes I wonder, are we just being random here? Are we deepening or opening simultaneously, in a unified way as a study group, or are we each opening just according to our own path, and not clear where we all stand together in a unified vision? Are we all exploring the same dimensions, or all experiencing the same levels of the vision? And how would we ‘know’? I’m not talking about the inherent beauty of how we individually experience as expressed by T-S-K, but rather curious about a unity inherent in the intimacy of T-S-K, in the intimacy of reality, and are we ‘approaching’ that? Are we sharing that? Or are we like philosophers, expounding individual perspectives and experiences? How do we know if we are grounding more and more individually and as a group in the deep fields of T-S-K?
I’m a constant oscillation – an oscillating focal setting, once a small aperture, then a wide aperture, repeating in a wavelike form, changing in amplitude, sometimes reaching harmonics, even pure silence, then dropping back into gravity fields and sensory kaleidoscopes.
But I ‘know’ that we are unified, that we are deepening, that openness is available, and that the vast beauty of Time, of Space, and Knowledge is always ready to absorb ‘me’, and change the ‘ratio’ of me/it.